Saulo Láuar, now 42, has come forward with accusations against judge Magid Nauef Láuar, asserting that an attempt of sexual abuse occurred during his adolescence. The decision to report the judge to the National Justice Council (CNJ) was prompted by a particularly controversial ruling where the judge acquitted a defendant in a case involving the rape of a 12-year-old child and has since caused public outrage. The emotional trigger for Saulo's revelation was the dissatisfaction expressed by the community regarding the judge's conduct, which he felt was perpetuating harmful behaviors in society.

The CNJ has begun its investigation and has reportedly received similar allegations from at least five other individuals who claim to have suffered sexual abuse linked to the same judge. The actions taken by the judge in the courtroom have raised serious concerns about his judgment and approach to cases involving minors, leading to calls for accountability and justice on behalf of the victims. Despite the gravity of the allegations, the judge, through the Tribunal of Justice, has chosen not to comment on the situation, leaving many questions unanswered.

This case highlights the complexities surrounding abuse allegations within the judicial system and underscores the courage required for individuals to speak out against powerful figures. As the investigation unfolds, there is a growing emphasis on ensuring that victims are heard and that justice prevails, particularly in cases where children are involved. Saulo’s decision to break his silence not only serves to address his past trauma but also sheds light on broader societal issues relating to power dynamics and the protection of vulnerable individuals in legal proceedings.