The article emphasizes the struggle of the Mexican state with inherent weaknesses, particularly a lack of understanding about its political construction and the necessary enforcement of laws. It reviews the historical concentration of power, indicating that after World War II, the military was distanced from power until it was re-engaged in the 1970s for political unrest and later for the fight against organized crime. This shift has sometimes led to the military's diversion into lucrative dealings, which can compromise their loyalty to the legitimate state mechanisms.

Moreover, the piece explores the underdevelopment of bureaucratic structures in Mexico, underscoring that the legal framework has often been used more as a negotiation tool than a strict set of rules. This has prevented the full institutionalization of state processes, leading to an environment where the rule of law is inconsistently applied. Since 1965, the focus appears to have been more on legitimizing power through negotiation rather than developing robust systems of governance.

Finally, the article suggests that these historical trends have left the Mexican state vulnerable, unable to properly address challenges domestically or maintain stability. The implications of this weakness are significant as they hinder effective governance and exacerbate existing issues, demonstrating a need for reform in both military and civilian bureaucratic sectors to ensure the state's integrity and efficacy in the modern context.