Hugo Motta, the President of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazil, has expressed his intention to see the constitutional amendment (PEC) that abolishes the 6x1 work schedule approved by March in the Constitution and Justice Committee and forwarded to the plenary by May. He drew a striking comparison between this legislative effort and the abolition of slavery, suggesting the importance of this change for workers' rights. Motta's decision to move forward with the PEC challenges President Lula's government, which prefers a constitutional urgency bill instead.

The debate surrounding the PEC is intensifying, with various industry, commercial, and service sector groups releasing studies on the potential impacts of this change. Business leaders are reportedly planning to mount an offensive to delay the vote on the PEC, indicating significant opposition from those who fear economic repercussions from the shift in work scheduling. This widespread opposition underscores the complicated landscape of interests at play as different sectors weigh the implications of altering long-standing work models.

Political leaders are also taking clear stances on the issue, as seen with Marcos Pereira, the President of the Republicanos party, who voiced his concerns about the changes. This situation highlights the intersecting dynamics of labor rights, economic implications, and political maneuvering in Brazil, reflecting a broader struggle over workplace regulations and the influence of various lobbies in the legislative process. As the March deadline approaches, the outcome of this debate will have lasting implications for workers, industries, and the political landscape in Brazil.