The Lula administration in Brazil is expressing apprehension regarding the potential loss of control over a significant labor proposal that seeks to abolish the 6x1 workweek schedule. This development follows House Speaker Hugo Motta's decision to back an alternative text outside of the government's original proposal. The crux of the government's concern lies in the legislative procedure chosen by Motta, which involves a constitutional amendment (PEC) requiring a three-fifths majority in both chambers of Congress, making it immune to presidential vetoes. This is in stark contrast to what the government hoped to pursue: a simple bill (PL) that could be either fully or partially vetoed following its approval by a simple majority.

The intention to reduce working hours has emerged as a pivotal agenda for the Lula administration as it navigates its final year before the next election, during which Lula aims for re-election. The government's original plan to propose a straightforward legislative process was strategically designed to maintain some level of oversight and influence, given the popularity of the proposed work hour reduction among the populace. This shift toward a constitutional amendment, however, complicates their regulatory framework and engagement with Congress.

The significant domestic support for reducing working hours underlines the social priorities of the current government, marking a shift towards more labor-friendly policies amidst a complex political landscape. This proposal not only addresses workers' demands for better work-life balance but also represents a strategic move to garner electoral support in the upcoming presidential race. The government's next steps will be critical as it seeks to navigate this legislative maneuvering while attempting to maintain its political capital and support among workers and constituents alike.