The piece comprises a series of reader comments reacting to the ongoing debate regarding the proposed 6x1 work shift in Brazil, which critics argue lacks consideration for workers' humanity and well-being. Marcia Alves de Pinho from São Paulo emphasizes that the livelihoods of many workers depend on lesser working hours, advocating for a 4x3 schedule as more humane and reflective of increased productivity due to technology. Other readers also criticize the government's focus on profitability over worker rights, pointing to the irony of lawmakers approving a 3x1 schedule for themselves while advocating for harsher conditions for the common labor force.

Comments from various readers also illustrate a divide in perspectives; while some argue for a balanced approach that includes more leisure and consumption (reflected by Nacib Hetti's suggestion of a 5x2 schedule), others express disbelief at the notion that too much leisure time (ócio) is detrimental. This inconsistency further highlights the ongoing struggle between labor rights advocates and policymakers in Brazil, where the historical context of labor exploitation remains a significant issue. The article suggests that there is a need to prioritize humane working conditions in light of this legislative debate that could shape future labor dynamics in the country.