A significant number of members of the Argentine Rural Society object to Nicolás Pino's potential bid for a fourth term, citing a possible 'institutional regression' and violation of the organization's statutes.
A large group of members from the Argentine Rural Society (SRA) has expressed their concerns in a letter regarding a potential fourth re-election of Nicolás Pino as president, arguing it poses an 'institutional regression' and represents a possible breach of the organization's statutes. This discontent stems from the belief that re-election could conflict with ethical standards expected within the society. Presenting their case against Pino's candidacy, they cite historical precedents and the intent to uphold the integrity of the organization's governance.
On the other side of the debate, the SRA's Executive Committee disputes these claims, asserting that a ruling from the General Inspection of Justice (IGJ) legally permits Pino to run for a new term in 2026. This legal backing fuels the controversy, highlighting the differing interpretations of regulatory amendments concerning re-elections. The organization is now grappling with internal divisions that affect its cohesion and effectiveness in advocating for the agricultural sector.
The controversy is compounded by a power struggle within the SRA, particularly between Nicolás Pino and his vice president, Marcos Pereda, who has expressed intentions to challenge Pino’s leadership. This conflict suggests a deeper rift in the organization, as longstanding members confront current leadership strategies. As the 2026 election approaches, the internal disputes could have significant implications for the SRA's future and for the agricultural community it represents.
