Fourteen government-affiliated politicians submitted a request to the presidency of the National Congress in Brazil, seeking to annul a session of the CPMI of the INSS which revealed confidential information concerning Lulinha, the son of President Lula. They claim that the session was conducted with 'clear partiality', asserting that the leadership of the CPMI has shown a bias against government members. This accusation implies a profound political conflict over the transparency and integrity of the parliamentary investigation.

The petition also calls for the initiation of a process for violation of decorum in the Ethics Council to investigate Senator Carlos Viana, the president of the CPMI. The complaint argues that there was a significant procedural error during the session, highlighting that government members constituted a majority yet were allegedly sidelined during a symbolic vote. They present evidence in the form of a photograph depicting the government members standing to reject the original request, signaling a chaotic atmosphere during the session.

This conflict draws attention to the ongoing tensions within Brazilian politics, especially regarding the oversight of the INSS and the implications this has for the government. With the parliamentary inquiry focused on sensitive issues like the financial dealings of high-profile individuals, the accusations about partiality could escalate into broader debates about accountability and governance in Brazil.