In this article, the author reflects on the supposed coherence observed in Argentine politics, highlighting the connection between words and actions amid discussions surrounding labor reform. The piece underscores the vehement opposition from Peronist factions, who have used inflammatory rhetoric to oppose the reform, labeling it as 'slavery' and evoking historical traumas to rally public sentiment against it. This hyperbolic discourse raises questions about the responsibility of language in political debates and its potential to incite violence.

The author contends that the reform in question is not only legitimate but was among the key issues that drove voters to support Javier Milei's candidacy. By advocating for a more flexible labor market, the government aims to stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and reduce informal employment. The article challenges readers to consider whether such legislative changes are effective in fulfilling their objectives, noting that the path to implementing such reforms may be fraught with challenges.

Ultimately, the commentary calls for a more measured understanding of political discourse and the implications of rhetoric in shaping societal reactions. It questions the sincerity of opposition claims and the possibility of genuine dialogue in an environment where hyperbole often reigns, suggesting that both fervent support and vehement opposition must engage more thoughtfully with the realities of governance and economic policy.