In a recent commentary, the author reflects on the labor reform that has gained partial approval from the Senate in Argentina. While acknowledging the bill's shortcomings and the backlash from influential groups such as the CGT (General Confederation of Labor) and politically connected businesses, the writer finds a glimmer of hope in the fact that there will finally be a labor law in place. The article points out that the reform was passed thanks to political maneuvering, which involved persuading several governors with funding, suggesting that this approach is commonplace in Argentine politics.

The author provocatively notes that the rejection of the law by Kirchnerism presents it as a positive development, implying that in contemporary Argentine politics, a law's worth may be determined by its opposition rather than its intrinsic merits. This rhetoric resonates with a broader sentiment among those who view the current political landscape as fundamentally transactional. By citing historical figures like San Francisco of Assisi, the writer emphasizes the moral ambiguity in the methods of enacting legislation, reinforcing the idea that political gains often come at a price, yet can still result in positive outcomes from a broader perspective.

Moreover, the commentary reflects growing frustrations within the Peronist Party (PJ), suggesting an internal crisis. The struggles depicted indicate that the party faces significant challenges in maintaining its relevance and unity amidst changing political tides. The author's concluding remark about ordinary Argentine citizens having the potential to be effective lawmakers underscores a populist sentiment, urging a reevaluation of who holds power and the competence of average citizens in shaping their political destinies.