Lawyers representing Mona Juul and Terje Rød-Larsen have publicly decried the corruption charges filed against their clients, asserting that these allegations infringe upon fundamental human rights. The attorneys from Elden Law Firm claim that Juul has been charged with gross corruption, while Rød-Larsen is accused of aiding in this corruption. They express their concerns in a press release, highlighting the implications of such charges on the individuals' rights and liberties.

John Christian Elden, the lawyer representing Rød-Larsen, calls for the withdrawal of the charges, labeling them as speculative and lacking in clarity. He argues that the broad nature of the accusations envelops every action the clients have taken over several decades, thus violating their rights to predictability and protection against arbitrary actions. Elden emphasizes that legal fairness demands a clear and precise basis for any defense, raising serious concerns about the potential for injustices.

The attorneys contend that the generality of the charges makes it nearly impossible for their clients to adequately defend themselves. By presenting a framework of unverified assumptions rather than definitive accusations, the prosecution has, in their view, undermined the legal process and the accused' rights. This situation raises critical questions about due process and accountability within the Norwegian legal system, as it pertains to issues of corruption and individual rights.