Økokrim has indicted Mona Juul and Terje Rød-Larsen for serious corruption and complicity in corruption, respectively. In response, their lawyer from Elden Advokatfirma, Thomas Skjelbred, asserts that corruption requires a position to associate the benefits with, which he believes is absent in this case. He mentions that some allegations concern time periods when Juul was on leave from her position, thus lacking the necessary elements for a corruption charge.

Criticism was also voiced by John Christian Elden, representing Rød-Larsen, who argued that the indictments are overly vague and unrestricted, potentially leading to a violation of the principles of justice and human rights. He emphasized that if the accusations are not precise, the grounds for them do not hold. This viewpoint raises larger questions about the integrity of the prosecution and the handling of legal standards regarding corruption in Norway.

The implications of these charges and the ensuing legal defense not only affect the individuals directly involved but also reflect on Norway's legal framework regarding corruption, which may be strained if judiciary proceedings hinge on ambiguous accusations. The case might attract further scrutiny, highlighting the delicate balance between enforcing anti-corruption laws and protecting individual rights within the Norwegian legal system.