The article from FAZ explores the concept of 'defensive democracy' in Germany, particularly questioning its relevance in light of the current political landscape. It recalls the early years of the Federal Republic when extremist parties were banned by the Federal Constitutional Court, a practice that now seems absent regarding the Alternative for Germany (AfD), which is designated as a 'securely right-wing extremist party' by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. The author suggests that the very idea of a 'defensive democracy' has become a buzzword often discussed in academic and public arenas, yet its practical implications appear to be diminishing.

The discussion includes the growing concerns about the AfD's increasing influence and its ability to operate without significant restrictions, raising questions about the resilience of democratic institutions in the face of extremist ideologies. The author reflects on the irony that while there is much discourse about 'defensive democracy' in media, education, and politics, proactive measures to curb extremist actions seem to be lacking. This situation creates a paradox where theory and practice diverge, leading to doubts about the effectiveness of Germany's democratic defenses.

In conclusion, the article emphasizes the urgent need for a reassessment of the mechanisms that uphold democracy in Germany. As extremist ideas gain traction and operate under the current legal framework, there is an underlying threat to the democratic values that the country seeks to protect. The author calls attention to the pressing necessity for both societal and legislative action to reinforce defenses against political extremism.