The concept of 'defensive democracy' has become a central theme in German political discourse, often discussed in various platforms such as academic lectures, media shows, and political education initiatives. Its origins trace back to the early years of the Federal Republic of Germany when extremist parties were banned by the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe. This tool is now seemingly unavailable in the context of the current political landscape, particularly concerning the Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has been identified as a 'securely right-wing extremist party' by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution.

This raises critical questions about the practical application of defensive democracy. Theoretically, it proposes the idea that a democracy must actively defend itself against extremist elements. However, if a party that qualifies as extremist can operate largely unimpeded, it prompts skepticism about the effectiveness of these democratic safeguards. The article suggests that the current political climate may not allow for the enforcement of this principle, leading to concerns about the erosion of democratic values and the capacity of institutions to counteract extremist ideologies.

In examining this issue, the author highlights the gap between the theoretical frameworks of defensive democracy and the realities of the political system today. The discussions surrounding this concept are widespread, yet the difficulty of translating theory into practice presents a challenge for policymakers and citizens alike. As Germany grapples with the implications of the AfD's presence and behavior, the long-term viability of its democratic principles could be at stake.