In Poland, a city council resolution led to the removal of A.K. from her lay judge position due to conduct that was deemed incompatible with the seriousness of the court. The court president had requested her dismissal based on multiple instances where A.K. failed to comply with court orders regarding the visitation rights of her child's father. Despite financial penalties imposed for her non-compliance, A.K. continued to obstruct these visitations, prompting concerns about her ability to serve as a lay judge within the judicial system.

The decision to dismiss A.K. was supported by legal opinion referencing a specific article of the Act on the System of Common Courts, which stipulates that a lay judge can be removed by the council that appointed them upon the court president's request. This highlights the accountability associated with the role of lay judges in Poland, who are expected to uphold the law and judicial decorum, particularly in family law matters, where personal conflicts can have significant implications for the judicial process.

This case not only raises questions about individual accountability among court officials but also reflects ongoing societal challenges regarding parental responsibilities and compliance with family court decisions. The implications of this ruling could resonate beyond this particular case, serving as a precedent for future cases involving judges and their personal conduct, especially in sensitive areas such as family law where personal and professional lines often blur.