In a recent statement, Beata Najjar elaborated on the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of Judge Dariusz Łubowski. She highlighted that the National Judicial Council (KRS) had requested the prosecutor's office to consider charges against her, suggesting potential misconduct in her judicial position. Najjar contended that she is a judge in a state of retirement and has raised concerns about the legitimacy of the current KRS, asserting that it no longer aligns with its constitutional identity as outlined by European Court of Human Rights and other judicial bodies.

Najjar articulated her ongoing opposition to the recently constituted KRS, which, according to her, lacks the necessary constitutional framework and legitimacy. She pointed out that her previous claims regarding the council's non-compliance with constitutional standards have not been addressed adequately. This situation has prompted Najjar to submit her declaration regarding her ability to continue serving as a judge directly to the Minister of Justice, rather than to the KRS, which she believes is currently functioning outside its lawful mandate.

The implications of this situation extend beyond just Najjar's individual case, as it raises significant questions about the rule of law and judicial independence in Poland. As the KRS's role is critically relevant to maintaining judicial integrity, the ongoing tensions surrounding its legitimacy and functionality pose broader challenges to the Polish judicial system as it faces scrutiny on both national and international fronts.