The article explores the challenges and boundaries of adapting classic literary works into film, particularly emphasizing the anachronistic elements present in character representation. Experts Roger Bastida, an art historian, and Elena Truan, a doctor in English Philology, scrutinize how characters such as Heathcliff from 'Wuthering Heights' and Agamemnon from 'The Odyssey' are portrayed on screen, often deviating from their original literary descriptions. They analyze how modern interpretations sometimes lead to significant departures from historical and contextual norms.

Bastida and Truan raise questions about the responsibilities of filmmakers to remain true to the source material while also making it accessible and relevant for contemporary audiences. They discuss how these adaptations can sometimes enforce stereotypes or fail to address complex issues like race and identity, as triggered by a non-racialized Heathcliff or the oddly contemporary portrayal of Agamemnon as resembling Batman. This raises deeper concerns about representation in cinema and the expectation of fidelity in adaptations.

Ultimately, the experts argue for a balance between creative freedom and respect for the text, emphasizing the need for filmmakers to thoughtfully consider their approach to adaptations. The conversation reflects broader societal debates about identity, representation, and the complexities of interpreting classic literature in today's cultural landscape.