The article explores the different adaptations of Emily Brontë's novel 'Wuthering Heights', beginning with William Wyler's 1939 film that is noted for its dramatic flair and strong performances by Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon. It contrasts this classical interpretation with Luis Buñuel's surrealist take, which views the novel as a dark illustration of dreams and the sinister forces within. Further, it examines Andrea Arnold's modern adaptation from 2011, which is described as a violent departure from the original text, suggesting that these adaptations often 'tear out the soul' of the book itself.

The critique highlights the challenges involved in translating literary works to screen and how film interpreters have historically varied in their fidelity to the source material. The mention of three distinct adaptations suggests that there is no single correct way to convey the 'soul' of a literary piece; instead, each adaptation must grapple with its interpretation of themes and character motivations appropriately. This ongoing dialogue about adaptation raises questions about what it means to truly represent a story in a different medium.

Additionally, the context implies a broader commentary on how modern interpretations, such as Instagram adaptations, may prioritize visual appeal over deeper narrative integrity, rendering them as superficially engaging but ultimately hollow. This raises critical reflections on both the nature of adaptive storytelling and the expectations of contemporary audiences when experiencing classic literature.