A Facebook user recently caused a stir by alleging that Ukrainian grain was responsible for the deaths of cattle in France, claiming it was due to a sudden outbreak of nodular dermatitis impacting livestock. This narrative reflects a familiar tactic in disinformation campaigns, which often seek to assign blame to Ukraine for various agricultural and economic issues. The post emphasized the catastrophic effects this disease allegedly had not only on the cattle but also on farmers, leading to extreme distress and even suicide among those affected.

In her post, the user described graphic scenes of cattle suffering and dying due to this health crisis and suggested that the grain imported from Ukraine did not meet EU safety standards. The accusations extended further, claiming that this poisonous grain was flooding the European market. She alleged that while it might be possible to trace the origins of meat sold in stores, processed foods and animal feed often make such tracing impossible, potentially endangering food safety across Europe.

The statement further linked the outbreak of nodular dermatitis to contamination from moldy and infected Ukrainian grain, and closed with a provocative statement reflecting a common narrative of hostility towards Ukraine. This incident highlights ongoing disinformation tactics that exploit public fears and frustrations, particularly around food safety and agricultural stability, thus emphasizing the need for critical scrutiny of online claims and narratives, especially those tied to geopolitical issues.