In the ongoing controversy surrounding Avimukteshwaranand, Mukundananda, a disciple of Shankaracharya, has publicly responded to being named in a First Information Report (FIR). He expressed that the actions of Uttar Pradesh's Chief Minister, Yogi Adityanath, are inappropriate and that such heinous accusations should not even be considered by the Prime Minister. Mukundananda emphasized that while Shankaracharya has a history of criticism, the Prime Minister and Home Minister have, to his knowledge, never made such allegations.

Mukundananda categorically denies the allegations against himself and Avimukteshwaranand, stating that they are baseless. He articulated his concern for fair justice amidst the accusations, which have drawn significant attention not only within religious circles but also at political and social levels. The controversy has incited a broader discussion regarding accountability and the implications of such high-profile accusations.

This incident showcases the complexities involved in handling sensitive allegations within Indian society, especially when they involve prominent religious figures. The fallout of this case may influence public perception of both the accused and the political figures involved, while also raising questions about the interplay between politics, religion, and justice in contemporary India.