Starting the National Judges' Conference on the 'Three Judicial Reform Bills'... Park Young-jae states 'It directly affects the protection of citizens' rights'
A nationwide judges' conference has been convened to discuss the three judicial reform bills pushed by the Democratic Party of Korea, which aim to reshape the relationship between the judiciary and citizen rights.
The Democratic Party of Korea has initiated a nationwide judges' conference to gather internal opinions and discuss measures concerning three judicial reform bills: laws against judicial distortion, lawsuits against judicial decisions, and the increase of Supreme Court justices. Held at the Supreme Court headquarters in Seocho-gu, Seoul, this meeting, led by Park Young-jae after his recent appointment, is in response to the party's commitment to pass the bills by March 3rd following the February extraordinary national assembly session. The judiciary, facing growing opposition, seeks to consolidate its stance on these reforms that threaten its independence and efficacy.
During the opening remarks, Park Young-jae acknowledged the judiciary's persistent efforts to deliver swift and fair trials while recognizing that it has not fully met the publicβs expectations. He emphasized the judiciary's critical role in protecting fundamental rights and the rule of law, urging judges to engage actively in the ongoing discussions about judicial reforms to rebuild public trust. This acknowledgment highlights the perceived disconnection between the judiciary and public influence, urging a need for self-reflection and responsiveness from the judicial community.
Among the bills under discussion, the introduction of the law against judicial distortion has sparked significant controversy, drawing criticisms from legal professionals who label it as a 'law to intimidate judges and prosecutors.' This legislative measure, along with others aimed at reforming judicial checks and balances, seeks to modify the judiciary's essential functions and has significant implications for citizens seeking justice through the courts. Therefore, the conference is seen as essential for articulating the judiciary's position and safeguarding its role in upholding the constitution and citizens' rights amid potential legislative changes.