The article examines the deteriorating state of Brazil's democratic system, particularly emphasizing the confusion among the three branches of government - Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary. It highlights how the theory of separation of powers, as proposed by the philosopher Montesquieu, is being undermined in practice, leading to significant issues within governance. The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has been implicated in creating barriers that prevent Legislative members from effectively questioning suspects involved in social security fraud, which indicates a troubling trend of judicial overreach and legislative impotence.

One of the highlighted corruption scandals within the National Social Security Institute (INSS) is not receiving the attention it deserves, as the Judiciary continues to impede Legislative inquiries, particularly through the use of judicial rulings that limit the powers of the Congress. The text asserts that the ability of Congress to conduct an inquiry via a Parliamentary Inquiry Commission (CPI), as guaranteed by the Brazilian Constitution, is being compromised. This absence of necessary oversight raises concerns over the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures in place and the accountability of public officials involved in the alleged frauds.

The implications of this situation suggest a broader systemic issue within Brazil’s governance structure, where checks and balances are increasingly ineffective. Without robust legislative capabilities to investigate and hold accountable those engaged in corruption, the confidence of the public in democratic institutions may erode, leading to further deterioration of accountability and transparency in government operations. The article sheds light on the importance of restoring the integrity of Brazil's separation of powers to ensure that no branch oversteps its bounds, ultimately stressing the need for reforms to both the judiciary and legislative processes in the country.