Senator Carlos Viana, the president of the Parliamentary Mixed Inquiry Commission (CPMI) of the INSS, has firmly stated that his committee will not accept a proposal for banker Daniel Vorcaro to provide testimony in a closed meeting in São Paulo. Instead, Viana emphasized that Vorcaro is expected to appear in person in Brasília, reinforcing the importance of transparency in the proceedings and the obligation of witnesses to respond to the committee’s inquiries. This stance reflects a commitment to ensuring complete accountability from key figures involved in the investigation.

The senator highlighted significant differences between the roles assigned to individuals in the Parliament and the Supreme Federal Court (STF), noting that while Vorcaro is treated as a witness by the CPMI, he is under investigation according to STF protocols. This discrepancy has become contentious, with Viana expressing frustration over perceived interference from the STF in the committee’s ability to conduct thorough investigations. The senator's comments indicate a deeper tension between legislative and judicial bodies in Brazil, particularly regarding who holds authority in addressing public inquiries.

With Viana's insistence on Vorcaro's attendance, there is an implication that the CPMI seeks to assert its power and autonomy in investigations related to the INSS. The situation underlines the ongoing challenges that parliamentary commissions face when navigating legal thresholds and the relationships with higher judicial authorities. This testimony is viewed as essential for uncovering the truth and fulfilling the public's right to information regarding the INSS investigation, potentially impacting broader perceptions of governance and accountability in Brazil.