In a recent public event advocating against a proposed referendum, former Senate President Pietro Grasso expressed strong opposition to a justice reform he believes will enable criminals to vote positively on the issue. Grasso, drawing parallels with another prominent figure, noted that the proposed changes could adversely impact the integrity of the electoral process by allowing individuals with criminal backgrounds to influence the outcome.

During his remarks, Grasso emphasized the implications this legislation could have on the perception and trust in the justice system. He argued that reforms aimed at justice should prioritize integrity and public safety, rather than creating loopholes that might benefit those who have violated the law. His statements reflect a broader concern among politicians and citizens alike regarding the possible consequences of such reforms for societal norms and respect for law.

The reaction to Grasso's comments has sparked a wave of discussions in political circles, especially from members of Forza Italia. The party has expressed outrage and launched protests against the proposed reforms, underscoring a growing division in Italy regarding the approach to justice and criminal policy. These developments highlight an ongoing debate about the balance between reforming the justice system and maintaining accountability and public trust.