In a recent statement regarding the Italian referendum on justice, Nicola Gratteri, a prominent prosecutor, stirred controversy by suggesting that only disreputable individuals, such as defendants and corrupt members of the freemasonry, support the 'yes' vote. His declaration was made amidst heightened tensions among various political factions, particularly within the right-wing parties, who are increasingly wary of losing support as the referendum draws closer. Gratteri's bold remarks reflect not only his personal views but also the broader societal divisions related to justice reform in Italy.

The referendum is seen as a critical turning point in addressing the effectiveness and fairness of the Italian judicial system. Proponents of the reforms argue that changes are necessary to modernize the judicial landscape and reduce corruption, while opponents fear that such reforms may undermine legal protections and hinder accountability. Gratteri's statements have sparked significant backlash from both sides of the political spectrum, with many arguing that his wording was both inflammatory and damaging to constructive dialogue around such an important issue.

The implications of Gratteri's words extend beyond mere rhetoric; they illustrate the fraught nature of contemporary Italian politics, where the politicization of justice can lead to intensified polarization. As citizens prepare to vote, the discourse surrounding the referendum is likely to shape the outcome, reflecting not only public sentiment towards judicial reform but also the political landscape in Italy going forward.