In a recent interview with a Bangladeshi newspaper, President Mohammad Shahabuddin made serious allegations against former Prime Minister Mohammad Yunus, stating that he was effectively kept under house arrest for an extended period of 18 months. The President claimed that these restrictions significantly disrupted his life, particularly affecting his participation in traditional Eid celebrations, a practice observed by all presidents since the country's independence. He described his situation during this time as feeling like a prisoner in the presidential residence, Bang Bhaban.

Shahabuddin also expressed his concern over Yunus’s government allegedly taking unconstitutional actions, which included plots to remove him from office and conceal vital trade agreements with the United States. The President’s assertions shed light on a period marked by political tension and disputes over governance, raising questions about the adherence to democratic norms under Yunus’s administration. This interview marks a notable moment in Bangladeshi politics, bringing to the forefront unresolved grievances from a challenging governance era.

These statements not only reflect Shahabuddin's personal experiences but also symbolize broader political dynamics in Bangladesh, wherein the legacies of previous administrations continue to impact current leadership. The President's claims of having been restricted in performing official duties underscore ongoing power struggles and indicate how historical grievances can shape contemporary political discourse in the nation, especially regarding respect for traditional practices and freedoms.