The conflict intensified when F. M. Leščiauskaitė reacted to D. Dirkstys' comments, labeling them as aggressive and inappropriate for public discourse. She argued that such outbursts should be treated within therapeutic settings rather than broadcasted on social media platforms, which influence public perceptions and interactions in everyday life. Leščiauskaitė's critique highlights a broader societal concern about how personal disputes and emotions are displayed and perceived online.

In her remarks, Leščiauskaitė advocated for kindness and love in relationships but drew attention to the aggressive behavior exhibited by Dirkstys, which she felt was harmful and deserving of scrutiny. Her statements resonate with ongoing conversations about the impact of social media on personal relationships and public behavior, pushing for a reevaluation of how such conflicts are addressed publicly.

The sharing of videos and further comments by Leščiauskaitė indicates her determination to clarify her perspective and stand against the normalization of aggression in public interactions. This situation not only explores themes of conflict resolution but also raises important questions about the responsibility of public figures in their portrayals of personal disputes, suggesting that clarity and compassion may be pivotal in mitigating such conflicts in public view.