After the conflict between O. Pikul and F. M. Leščiauskaitė – sharp response from D. Dirksčius: spoke without censorship
A public dispute escalated between social media personalities Oksana Pikul and Fausta Marija Leščiauskaitė following an inflammatory comment made by D. Dirksčius.
A provocative exchange unfolded on social media in Lithuania involving the personalities Oksana Pikul, Fausta Marija Leščiauskaitė, and D. Dirksčius. The incident was ignited by a harsh remark from Dirksčius directed at opinion influencer Naglis Bierancas, which prompted Leščiauskaitė to voice her outrage on Facebook, expressing that she would feel 'ashamed' if she were in Pikul's position. In contrast, Pikul asserted that she felt no shame and framed the discourse as being a matter solely involving men.
While the women maintained a relatively civil tone in articulating their stances, Dirksčius responded fiercely, publicly declaring his disdain for the situation via an Instagram post. His blunt comment, questioning the relevance of Leščiauskaitė’s perspective with a derogatory implication, highlighted the heightened emotions and tensions surrounding the discussion. The matter quickly garnered attention on social media, reflecting broader issues of gender dynamics and discourse in public forums.
These developments underscore not only the personal conflicts among these social media figures but also a potential reflection of societal attitudes toward public gendered exchanges in Lithuania. As such exchanges increasingly capture public interest, they raise questions about the implications of such dialogues and the responsibilities of influencers in shaping perceptions within society.