The article emphasizes that in a democracy, no one has the right to physically harm another person simply for disagreeing with them or for personal dislike. It argues against any justification for acts of violence, including spitting or physically obstructing someone’s entry into public spaces. The discussion points out that although protests by leftist groups aimed at public figures can be seen as legitimate, they should not cross the line into aggression or intimidation.

The writer expresses the view that every citizen, including government ministers, should have the unimpeded right to move freely without the fear of violence from others. This principle is crucial for maintaining a civilized society, where disagreements can be expressed without resorting to physical confrontations. The author criticizes the disruptive behavior of certain leftist factions who demonstrate against the government, suggesting that their methods lack respect for democratic principles and civil discourse.

Overall, the article calls for a reassessment of protest methods, advocating for more civilized forms of expression that uphold the dignity of all individuals involved. It highlights the need for respect, even amidst disagreement, reinforcing that democratic ideals should not be compromised by violence or intimidation.