The article discusses the long-standing misconception that protests are inherently peaceful and family-friendly. It reflects on past decades when demonstrations were often infiltrated by extremists and violent factions, undermining the peaceful intentions of ordinary citizens. Despite the efforts of families and community members to maintain peaceful demonstrations, historical events have shown a pattern of violence erupting, often overshadowing the peaceful message of the majority of participants.

The author points out that this scenario has repeated itself over the years, with peaceful protests disrupted by radical groups seeking confrontation with authorities. This recurring theme raises questions about the effectiveness of portraying demonstrations solely as family-oriented events when, in reality, they attract elements that are diametrically opposed to the peaceful assembly's original goals. The presence of radical groups carrying out violent acts during protests serves to distort the public perception of these gatherings.

Furthermore, the commentary touches on the implications of such disruptions, suggesting that they serve as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in organizing and participating in societal movements. It calls for a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play within protests, emphasizing the need for greater awareness of the contrasting motivations among participants. The article ultimately challenges the romanticized view of protests, advocating for a more nuanced perspective that acknowledges the potential for violence amidst calls for peace.