The Finnish professional union has expressed strong concern over Kela's current approach to its tendering process for demanding medical rehabilitation services. They argue that Kela is making a significant error by focusing exclusively on cost in its procurement strategies. This decision, according to the union, could severely undermine the quality and continuity of rehabilitation services and jeopardize the rights of clients who depend on these essential health services.

Sanna Hosio, the chair of the Finnish Physiotherapists, has pointed out that rehabilitation is not a standardized product; instead, it involves expert work where the professional skills of therapists play a crucial role in the outcomes. This is particularly critical for clients with significant challenges in their functional capabilities, as Kela searches for providers who can deliver high-level rehabilitation services. The emphasis on price alone overlooks the complexities and nuances involved in delivering effective rehabilitation.

The union is urging Kela to halt the current procurement process to reassess and refine its criteria. They believe that placing adequate emphasis on quality requirements, in addition to cost considerations, is essential to ensure that clients receive the best possible care and support throughout their rehabilitation journeys. The ongoing debate highlights the broader implications for public health policy in Finland and the importance of balancing budgetary constraints with the need for high-quality healthcare services.