A recent decision by the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais (TJ-MG) to acquit a 35-year-old man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl has raised significant legal questions among experts. The man, who was initially sentenced to over nine years in prison, was acquitted based on precedents that experts believe are not appropriately applied to his case. These discussions highlight the challenges in interpreting laws relating to sexual crimes against minors, particularly regarding consent and the dynamics involved in such sensitive cases.

The Brazilian Penal Code explicitly defines the crime of rape of a vulnerable person as engaging in sexual acts with individuals under 14 years of age, regardless of the victim's consent or prior sexual experiences. However, the recent acquittal has sparked concerns over the judicial interpretation of consent and the implications of relational dynamics, emphasizing the importance of adhering to a more precise application of the law to protect vulnerable populations.

Legal professionals stress that the precedents cited in the defense's argument may undermine the seriousness of sexual assault laws designed to protect minors. Critics argue that such decisions could set a dangerous standard, causing potential harm by diminishing the perceived severity of sexual crimes against underage individuals. Therefore, this case not only reflects ongoing debates about judicial interpretations of consent but also highlights the necessity for consistent legal protections for minors in similar situations.