The Civic Coalition has voiced concerns about Judge Carlos Mahiques' impartiality in the ongoing investigation regarding the true owners of a lavish estate in Pilar, which is believed to be associated with officials from the Argentine Football Association (AFA). The request comes even though the members of the Coalition are not directly involved in the lawsuit but are acting as whistleblowers, having initially prompted the investigation by federal judge Daniel Rafecas, followed by judicial scrutiny from other judges. The focal point of their argument centers on the allegation that Judge Mahiques celebrated his birthday at this property, leading to questions about his ability to remain neutral in the case.

The case has drawn public interest due to the ostentatious nature of the estate and the implications it has for transparency and accountability within the AFA. If Judge Mahiques is indeed removed from the case, it could pave the way for a different approach to the investigation, potentially influencing the outcome regarding who ultimately owns the property. This issue is emblematic of wider concerns regarding the connections between sport, politics, and power in Argentina, highlighting how allegations of corruption can complicate legal proceedings.

Given that the Civic Coalition is pushing for judicial integrity and fairness, their request adds further pressure on the judiciary to act in a manner that upholds public trust. The outcome of this situation could have significant implications for the relationship between the AFA and Argentine society, especially amidst ongoing debates about corruption in sports organizations, and it may also set precedents regarding judicial conduct in high-profile cases.