The article by Ivica Granić addresses the provocative use of Ustaša symbolism as a method to highlight the perceived double standards in anti-fascism, particularly in the context of recent statements made by a conference speaker, Mr. Dabro. Granić argues that while the calls for the condemnation of communism's symbols align with European conventions, the political left's response seems to distort European traditions and values by not uniformly denouncing all totalitarian regimes. This brings forth the argument that utilizing one totalitarian ideology to critique another may not be entirely unjustified, but rather a necessary confrontation in political discourse.

Granić delves into historical context, referencing the renowned author Ivo Andrić, who points out that when a particular state of affairs becomes intolerable, it is imperative to act rather than remain passive. This notion of pushing a situation to its limits, similar to the provocation of Ustaša symbolism, is presented as a methodological approach for political criticism. The underlying message here revolves around the necessity of addressing historical wrongs without falling into hypocrisy in the face of totalitarian history.

Ultimately, Granić's piece raises broader questions about how societies confront their pasts and the selectivity with which they critique various totalitarian symbols. As debates on history and memory continue to evolve, the article urges for a consistency in moral and historical judgment that reflects a genuine commitment to democratic values and human rights across the board, regardless of the political ideology in question.