The article highlights the importance of public perception in political communication, emphasizing that the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) faces a delicate balance between protecting its institutional authority and responding to external pressures. The author notes that over the past three decades, the discourse surrounding political institutions has significantly evolved, emphasizing the need for authority figures to not only be virtuous but to also appear virtuous in the public eye.

This challenge is particularly relevant for the STF, as it navigates a politically charged environment where its decisions and actions are scrutinized by various stakeholders. The court's legitimacy hinges on its ability to maintain a perception of fairness and justice, even in the face of dissent and opposition. The article argues that if the STF becomes overly protective of its reputation, it risks alienating the very public trust that upholds its authority, which could have profound implications for Brazilian democracy.

In conclusion, the article calls for a more nuanced understanding of power dynamics and the role of perception in sustaining the authority of political institutions in Brazil. The STF must find ways to engage with the public constructively, ensuring that it is seen as both impactful and just, lest it lose the support of the public it serves. The insights provided here resonate not just within the Brazilian context but also offer a broader commentary on the intersection between authority and public perception in democracies worldwide.