In a recent interview on Yle's Ykkösaamu program, Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen articulated Finland's official stance regarding a potential US military attack on Iran. Valtonen emphasized that Finland does not support such military intervention, underscoring that military solutions are not conducive to achieving long-term peace. Instead, she cautioned of the significant escalation risks associated with an attack, which could lead to a prolonged conflict. Valtonen suggested that diplomacy and negotiations should take precedence over military action as the preferred avenue for resolving tensions with Iran.

Moreover, Valtonen assessed the potential outcomes of a US attack, noting that while the US may be trying to pressure Iran by assembling military forces in close proximity, it is equally plausible that actual military strikes could occur. She expressed concern that such an escalation could result in a "weeks-long war," further complicating an already volatile situation. Valtonen highlighted uncertainty about whether US allies would join in the event of a conflict, particularly as any US operation might primarily involve airstrikes, which complicates the involvement of ground forces from allied countries.

Valtonen's statements resonate within the wider geopolitical context surrounding tensions in the Middle East, particularly considering Finland's position within the European Union, which generally favors diplomatic efforts over military interventions. Finland's emphasis on negotiation over military action suggests a call for a more balanced approach to international relations, especially in volatile regions such as Iran. Valtonen's insights might reflect broader concerns within Europe regarding the implications of US foreign policy decisions and the need for collaborative diplomatic efforts to prevent conflict.