Following Finland's defeat in the Olympic semi-final against Canada, the Finnish head coach, Antti Pennanen, expressed concerns about a goal scored by Canada that preceded the match's pivotal moment. Pennanen claimed that the Finnish team believed the third goal by Canada was offside, a sentiment that sparked debate in the wake of the match. Cooper, the Canadian coach, addressed these concerns in a light-hearted manner during a post-game interview, revealing that he had also questioned whether the goal was indeed offside at the moment it occurred.

Cooper recounted his immediate reaction after the goal, stating that he sought clarification from his video team regarding the offside question. According to him, the team confirmed that there was no offside, which allowed him to put the matter to rest. However, he humorously expressed doubt towards his team’s judgment and indicated that he would reevaluate the situation, contemplating whether a different camera angle might have provided new evidence that could cast doubt on the original call. This openness reflects the nature of sports where controversial calls are common and often subjected to scrutiny long after the game has ended.

Meanwhile, Nathan MacKinnon, the player who scored the decisive goal for Canada, expressed his own anxiety regarding the officials' decision-making process. Such moments highlight the tension in competitive sports where every decision can significantly impact the outcome of the game. The dialogue around the offside call exemplifies how closely analyzed moments in sport can become, drawing attention to the importance of officiating and the technology used to support it.