During the men's Olympic tournament semi-final, Canada's equalizing goal sparked significant emotions, particularly for Finnish goalie Juuse Saros. The incident occurred when Saros was covering the puck and was toppled by Canadian player Brad Marchand, allowing Shea Theodore to score the equalizer just seconds later. Saros voiced his frustration toward the referees over the questionable play, raising the tension within the game. This moment highlighted the intensity of competition in the Olympic arena, with emotions running high among players and officials alike.

Further complicating the situation, Finnish assistant coach Tuomo Ruutu appeared to discuss a potential challenge for the play with video officials. However, the goal was not reviewed at all. Finnish ice hockey expert Topi Nättinen commented that the decision not to challenge the play was the right one, emphasizing that an unsuccessful challenge would have put Finland on the penalty kill. Nättinen noted that while Erik Haula did push Marchand onto Saros, Marchand was able to move away quickly, placing Saros in a normal stopping position at the time of the goal.

This incident not only reflects the immediate frustrations experienced by players in the thick of competition but also showcases the strategic considerations that coaches must navigate in high-stakes games. Ultimately, the decision not to challenge weighed heavily on the game's dynamics, as teams weigh the risks and rewards of utilizing their video review options in moments of heightened tension.