Brussels has faced increasing backlash following the decision to send Commissioner Dubravka Suica as an observer to the inaugural meeting of Trump's Peace Board in Washington. This controversial body focuses on the future of Gaza, yet notably lacks the participation of Palestinian representatives, raising eyebrows among various EU member states. Many countries within the EU, including France, Belgium, and Spain, declined to join the meeting, underlining their discontent with the board's makeup and purpose.

The essence of the criticism stems from both the nature of the Peace Board and the implications of the EU's involvement in such a contentious initiative led by former President Trump. Critics argue that the board appears to disregard Palestinian voices, which could undermine the EU's credibility and stance as a mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The situation calls into question the EU's foreign policy direction and its engagement with initiatives perceived as biased or ill-conceived.

As the European Foreign Ministers prepare to discuss Suica's participation, the political ramifications of this engagement could significantly impact the EU's relationships within the region and could provoke further debates about its role in peace processes. The ongoing discourse reflects broader geopolitical tensions and the challenges of maintaining a cohesive EU foreign policy in complex conflicts.