The European Commission has publicly defended its decision to attend the first meeting of the US-led Peace Council, in response to criticism from several EU member states, particularly France. A spokesperson for the Commission clarified that it was within the Commission's authority to accept such invitations without needing prior approval from the Council of the EU. This stance reinforces the Commission's autonomous role in international relations and its commitment to peace initiatives.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barbier criticized the Commission's decision, arguing that it acted without a mandate from the Council, thus questioning the legitimacy of its participation. This exchange highlights the tensions within the EU regarding foreign policy decisions and the balance of power between individual member states and the overarching EU institutions. The different positions taken by EU leaders underscore the complexity of consensus in a multi-national organization.

Furthermore, the Commission emphasized that attending the meeting does not equate to an endorsement of the Peace Council itself. Commissioner Dubravka Suica's participation was framed as a commitment to the Palestinian cause and support for the rebuilding of Gaza. This nuance seeks to clarify that the EU remains committed to addressing the humanitarian needs in Palestine while engaging in international dialogues, thus balancing diverse perspectives while pursuing its diplomatic objectives.