Feb 20 • 09:47 UTC 🇵🇱 Poland Rzeczpospolita

The abortion case in Oleśnica. Małgorzata Manowska vs. the prosecutor's office. The court's decision is here

The article discusses a high-profile abortion case involving a woman who sought to terminate her late-term pregnancy due to health concerns, leading to legal implications involving judicial authority and prosecutorial decisions in Poland.

The article highlights a controversial abortion case that unfolded in Poland, where a woman identified only as Anita sought to terminate her pregnancy at 36 weeks after learning that her unborn child might have a severe bone disease. Doctors at the Central Clinical Hospital of the Medical University in Łódź offered a cesarean section but refused to perform a method known as fetal asystole induction, which involves injecting potassium chloride into the fetus to induce death before termination. Ultimately, the procedure was carried out by Dr. Gizela Jagielska in Oleśnica.

The case has raised significant legal and ethical questions, prompting the First President of the Supreme Court, Małgorzata Manowska, to lodge an appeal against the prosecutor's decision regarding the case. The prosecutor's office in Oleśnica decided to terminate the investigation into the circumstances surrounding the abortion, which has led to public outcry and discussions about the complexities of abortion laws in Poland, known for its stringent policies regarding reproductive rights.

As the legal battle continues, the case exemplifies the broader societal and political challenges surrounding abortion access in Poland, especially concerning cases of severe fetal anomalies. The implications of the court's decision and the public and judicial response may shape future cases and the ongoing debate over reproductive rights in the country.

📡 Similar Coverage