Ivan Pokupac, a Croatian activist and conservative influencer, recently faced the removal of his Facebook profile, which boasted a following of 76,000, due to violations of the platform's community standards regarding hate speech. Pokupac highlighted a specific post about Nenad Stazić, a member of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), in which he referenced Stazić's controversial statement implying that the victors of the 1945 war had not fully completed their work. In his defense, Pokupac claims that he was merely contextualizing Stazić's words rather than promoting hate speech as alleged by Facebook.

The shutdown of Pokupac's profile touches on a larger issue regarding content moderation on social media platforms, which have faced scrutiny over enforcing their rules about hate speech. This not only affects individual users like Pokupac but raises broader questions about the balance between free speech and responsible content regulation. His situation underscores the challenges individuals face within these digital spaces, particularly when dealing with topics related to politics and historical interpretations.

In response to the profile removal, Pokupac is considering reporting the incident to the Agency for the Protection of Personal Data in Croatia, encouraging others who have experienced similar issues to do the same. This move could point towards a potential legal challenge against social media platforms' content moderation practices, especially concerning the lack of transparency in how decisions are made regarding user posts.