Feb 19 • 17:30 UTC 🇭🇷 Croatia Narod.hr

The Facebook Battle that Novosti Calls Out: Here's What Vlahović, Pokupec, Bauer, Vukušić, Karačić Say...

A recent article by Novosti criticized right-wing influencers on Facebook, prompting strong reactions from accused individuals such as Marin Vlahović and others.

The article 'How Dangerous Are Right-Wing Influencers on Facebook?' published by Novosti, a government-funded publication, has generated significant media attention and debate on social networks due to its critical portrayal of the so-called 'right intelligence.' The article labels prominent figures from this sphere negatively, which was expected to provoke reactions from those mentioned, resulting in widespread discussion online. Various influencers, including Marin Vlahović, Thomas Bauer, Herman Vukušić, and Davorin Karačić, responded on social media, with Ivan Pokupec addressing the issue for Narod.hr, particularly highlighting the recent deactivation of his Facebook account.

Marin Vlahović, identified in the Novosti article as a leading negative figure and influencer on Facebook, reacted strongly to the accusations, stating that he would consult a lawyer regarding the allegations and expected corrections for the inaccuracies described in the article. His responses reflect the broader concern among those criticized about how their online presence is represented and the consequences it might have for their reputation and influence. The backlash against the piece illustrates the ongoing tensions between left-leaning media and right-wing figures in Croatia, highlighting the cultural and political divide that exists in the public discourse.

The article's impact extends beyond individual responses; it speaks to the larger issue of how social media platforms and influencers can sway public opinion and the narratives surrounding them. The dialogue generated by this incident may influence how such influencers operate online and seek to defend their positions, particularly in the face of media criticisms. It also raises questions about media accountability and the responsibilities of publications that engage in such discourse, given the potential repercussions for those involved.

📡 Similar Coverage