In a calm yet firm tone, Bernadette Nicotra, the sole elected magistrate in Italy's Superior Council of the Judiciary (Csm), explained her refusal to endorse a public statement regarding Nicola Gratteri, who recently found himself in controversy following his remarks. Unlike her colleagues, Nicotra believes that the weight of words spoken by members of the Csm is significantly amplified, especially in an environment discussing reforms affecting the justice system. She respects the opinions of her colleagues but feels the necessity to preserve the impartial stance of the Csm in such matters.

Nicotra discussed the complexities and responsibilities faced by magistrates within the Csm, particularly when it comes to expressing personal opinions that might be misconstrued as official stances of the governing body of the judiciary. She stressed that while expressing individual viewpoints can be seen as legitimate for a singular magistrate, it must be approached with caution by those in leadership roles. Her decision highlights a broader discussion on maintaining neutrality and avoiding politicization within the judiciary amid significant changes and reforms.

This situation raises critical questions about the role of magistrates in public discourse and their responsibilities as members of an institution that should remain unbiased. Nicotra's decision not to support the statement reflects her commitment to upholding the integrity of the Csm and to fostering a judicial environment that prioritizes impartiality over personal political positions, especially during these turbulent times in the Italian justice system.