The Alberta government is under fire for comments made by Bruce McAllister, the executive director of Premier Danielle Smith’s office, who decried Canada's immigration policy as involving 'unsustainable mass immigration.' His statements have drawn significant criticism, particularly the implication that immigration is being used as a tool for political gain. Anna Triandafyllidou, an expert on immigration from Toronto Metropolitan University, expressed concern that such rhetoric could signal a shift towards the politicization of immigration, which Canada has historically avoided.

McAllister's remarks included questioning the rationale behind admitting individuals from nations with 'failed systems' and expressed nostalgia for Canada's 'Judeo-Christian heritage.' This has spurred outrage among many who view immigration as a pivotal element of Canada's identity and success. Critics argue that this attitude not only misrepresents the contributions of immigrants but also instigates division and xenophobia within Canadian society.

Triandafyllidou countered McAllister's assertions by highlighting the multicultural nature of cities like Edmonton and Calgary, emphasizing that they thrive on diversity. The ongoing dialogue points to a potentially dangerous trend in Canadian politics where immigration becomes a scapegoat for internal issues, with far-reaching implications on social cohesion and policy direction. This situation raises important questions about how immigration will be debated in the upcoming electoral landscape.