The article delves into the historical practice of sinecures, positions or offices that require little to no work yet provide substantial financial compensation. By drawing parallels between medieval popes and 18th-century princes, the author illustrates how figures in power often sought to benefit their family members through such roles. The term 'sinecure' comes from Latin, meaning 'without care,' highlighting the seemingly effortless nature of these positions that catered to familial ties rather than merit.

In today's context, the piece notes that these sinecures persist, manifesting themselves in various modern forms, often criticized for perpetuating privilege within exclusive circles. The author specifically hints at contemporary examples of sinecure holders who may have connections with notorious figures like Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting a continuity of nepotism that raises ethical concerns. This reinforces the idea that such practices are not merely relics of the past but are alive today, often hidden behind a façade of legitimacy.

The discussion serves as a critique of a political and social system that still allows for the creation of unearned positions of power, drawing attention to the implications of such practices for society. By highlighting the historical roots of sinecures and their prevalence in modern times, the author calls for a reevaluation of how positions of influence are allocated, urging a move towards more meritocratic practices that ensure fairness and accountability.