Matheus Cunha, a striker for Manchester United, provides a nuanced perspective on the recent managerial changes at the club, particularly regarding the comparison between former manager Ruben Amorim and current interim manager Michael Carrick. Cunha emphasizes that although United has experienced success under Carrick, winning four out of five matches since his appointment, the situation is not as clear-cut as some might suggest. He believes that Amorim should share credit for laying the groundwork that has allowed for this improvement in performance.

Ruben Amorim was dismissed from his role as manager after a series of disappointing results, culminating in a 1-1 draw against Leeds, which prompted a heated outburst from him. At the time of his departure, Manchester United was struggling at sixth position in the league, having finished a disappointing 15th previously and lost in the Europa League final. With only 24 wins from 63 matches across 14 months, Amorim’s tenure was marked by struggles and a distinct tactical approach that included a 3-4-2-1 formation.

Cunha's comments reflect a broader discourse on managerial responsibility in football, highlighting the complexities of assessing a coach's influence on team performance. The striker's assertion that Amorim’s strategies and methods contributed to the team's recent resurgence under Carrick provokes thought about continuity in football management and the importance of building on established systems rather than completely redefining them with new leadership. As Manchester United continues to build momentum under Carrick, the discussion around the previous managerial era remains relevant, indicating that the path to success often involves learning from past experiences.