President Donald Trump's newly established Board of Peace convened for its first meeting on Thursday, with participation from 25 out of over 60 invited countries. Among those present were key U.S. allies such as Israel, Hungary, and Saudi Arabia. However, several prominent nations, including France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Norway, and Sweden, declined the invitation. Interestingly, while these countries did not send representatives, Norway participated in the meeting as an observer, along with various other European nations and the European Union.

The initiative, while attracting some notable support, faces heavy criticism. Many experts and advocates, including the human rights organization Article 19, argue that Trump's Board of Peace aims to undermine the United Nations Security Council. Trump, however, dismissed these concerns, stating that the Board would oversee the UN and ensure it operates effectively. Critics, particularly from France, contend that this new council contradicts the principles of the United Nations, raising concerns about its legitimacy and potential implications for international diplomacy.

As the Board of Peace embarks on its mission, the mixed response to its creation raises questions about the future of multilateral cooperation and peacemaking efforts. The division among nations in their response to the council signifies broader geopolitical tensions, particularly in how they relate to U.S. foreign policy. The establishment of such a body may have repercussions for the effectiveness of the UN and international peace efforts, depending on its ability to gain global credibility and cooperation from a wider array of nations.