The inaugural meeting of the Peace Council, established by President Donald Trump, is occurring today in Washington, D.C. This council has attracted criticism for its intention to operate separately from the United Nations. Major leaders including those from the United Kingdom, France, and Germany have declined invitations to participate, indicating a significant divide over the perceived legitimacy and purpose of this council.

The council seems designed not only to facilitate peace initiatives but also to serve as a platform for Trump’s ongoing influence, even after his presidency may end. There's controversy surrounding the sale of permanent seats on the council for substantial sums, with reports suggesting that a billion dollars could be the price tag for certain positions. Despite the council’s original goal of addressing the reconstruction of Gaza, progress appears mired in political rhetoric rather than actionable developments, as conditions on the ground continue to be dire amid ongoing Israeli military actions against Hamas.

Current discussions within the council could potentially reshape diplomatic relations in the region, especially if it draws further away from established international bodies like the UN. The lack of participation from traditional Western allies may signal a shift in global diplomatic strategies, with far-reaching implications for conflict resolution approaches in the Middle East. As tensions remain high, the effectiveness of this council and its ability to mediate peace will be closely scrutinized.