The article from France24 reports on Donald Trump's promise of a 'Board of Peace' focused on the Gaza conflict, an initiative aimed at fostering stability and resolution in the region. Critics suggest that, while the gesture may be well-intentioned, it amounts to little more than a symbolic act amid ongoing tensions and violence in Gaza. The complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict raises doubts about the potential impact of such initiatives, given the entrenched positions on both sides.

The piece explores the historical context of past peace efforts in the region, highlighting that many previous proposals have failed to bring about lasting solutions. Trump's history in foreign policy and his unique approach to diplomacy are discussed, framing this new pledge within the broader narrative of his presidency’s foreign relations record. The skepticism expressed by various political analysts and regional experts serves to underscore a general disbelief in the efficacy of high-profile announcements without substantive follow-through.

In conclusion, the article implies that while Trump's 'Board of Peace' may generate headlines, its real-world implications are likely minimal without serious engagement and negotiation with the key stakeholders in the Gaza conflict. The ongoing situation in the region calls for more than symbolic gestures, suggesting a need for concrete actions that address the root causes of the conflict and facilitate meaningful dialogue for peace.