The issue of revoking permanent residency permits from approximately 185,000 individuals has emerged as a key agenda for the Swedish Democrats, yet it remains one of the most controversial topics in Swedish politics. Initial evaluations of the proposal met significant criticism from referral authorities, indicating widespread skepticism regarding its feasibility and implications. This contentious debate has highlighted the complex dynamics surrounding immigration and policy-making in Sweden, particularly given the significant consequences such measures could have on vulnerable populations.

Recently, a rift among the Tidö parties became evident as they discussed the future of the proposal. While the Swedish Democrats have expressed a consensus on moving forward with the proposal based on previous agreements, other parties such as Moderaterna, Kristdemokraterna, and Liberalerna have called for further investigations into the matter. They argue that the existing study is insufficient and does not adequately address critical aspects of potential citizenship pathways for the affected individuals, raising concerns about fairness and integration in the migration system.

In a recent statement during a media segment, Jimmie Åkesson, the leader of the Swedish Democrats, indicated a willingness to postpone the legislation concerning the revocation of residency permits. This development suggests that the proposal may not be enacted before the election, pointing to an evolving political landscape where immigration policy remains a focal point of contention and negotiation among ruling parties. The postponement may reflect strategic considerations as the parties align their positions ahead of the elections, balancing their hardline stances with the need to garner broader support from the electorate.